<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: grammar gaffe friday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thisfish.com/grammar-gaffe-friday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thisfish.com/grammar-gaffe-friday/</link>
	<description>Found the bike. Not changing the title.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 05:54:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: N. Elizabeth</title>
		<link>http://thisfish.com/grammar-gaffe-friday/#comment-18626</link>
		<dc:creator>N. Elizabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 06:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisfish.com/?p=1252#comment-18626</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I have never heard the word &quot;forte&quot; pronounced correctly. When pronounced &quot;for-tay&quot; it means &quot;loud&quot;, when referring to something one does well, it is pronounced &quot;fort&quot;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My other pet peeves are: less/fewer (almost always wrong), and &quot;these ones&quot; which really brings about the chalk-board reaction.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have never heard the word &#8220;forte&#8221; pronounced correctly. When pronounced &#8220;for-tay&#8221; it means &#8220;loud&#8221;, when referring to something one does well, it is pronounced &#8220;fort&#8221;. </p>
<p>My other pet peeves are: less/fewer (almost always wrong), and &#8220;these ones&#8221; which really brings about the chalk-board reaction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://thisfish.com/grammar-gaffe-friday/#comment-18625</link>
		<dc:creator>M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisfish.com/?p=1252#comment-18625</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, &quot;Fish,&quot; with the photo naming, I don&#039;t think whether you&#039;re engaged in an action in the photo has anything to do with it. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;When labeling a photo, you&#039;re using &quot;Pickles and me&quot; as simply an abbreviated version of the sentence &quot;This is a photo of Pickles and me,&quot; right? You&#039;d use the same construction about any photo of you and Pickles, regardless of whether or not you were engaged in an action. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;Examples:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Scenario 1--You are doing nothing in the photo.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You&#039;d say: &quot;[This is a photo of] Pickles and me.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;Scenario 2--You are swimming in a pool in the photo.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You&#039;d say: &quot;[This is a picture of] Pickles and me [swimming in a pool].&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;Take out the words in brackets in each case and you have just &quot;Pickles and me&quot; remaining. Add the words back and you have two grammatically correct sentences, and unlike in your example, they are consistent in their wording (both use&quot;Pickles and me&quot; as the object in the sentence). &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;What do you think? (I know I&#039;m about a million years late in commenting on this post.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, &#8220;Fish,&#8221; with the photo naming, I don&#8217;t think whether you&#8217;re engaged in an action in the photo has anything to do with it. </p>
<p>When labeling a photo, you&#8217;re using &#8220;Pickles and me&#8221; as simply an abbreviated version of the sentence &#8220;This is a photo of Pickles and me,&#8221; right? You&#8217;d use the same construction about any photo of you and Pickles, regardless of whether or not you were engaged in an action. </p>
<p>Examples:</p>
<p>Scenario 1&#8211;You are doing nothing in the photo.</p>
<p>You&#8217;d say: &#8220;[This is a photo of] Pickles and me.&#8221;</p>
<p>Scenario 2&#8211;You are swimming in a pool in the photo.</p>
<p>You&#8217;d say: &#8220;[This is a picture of] Pickles and me [swimming in a pool].&#8221;</p>
<p>Take out the words in brackets in each case and you have just &#8220;Pickles and me&#8221; remaining. Add the words back and you have two grammatically correct sentences, and unlike in your example, they are consistent in their wording (both use&#8221;Pickles and me&#8221; as the object in the sentence). </p>
<p>What do you think? (I know I&#8217;m about a million years late in commenting on this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me, Myself and I</title>
		<link>http://thisfish.com/grammar-gaffe-friday/#comment-18624</link>
		<dc:creator>Me, Myself and I</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisfish.com/?p=1252#comment-18624</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Since the dreaded &quot;alot&quot; was discussed earlier, I would like to voice another pet peeve of mine... &quot;anyways&quot;. It&#039;s surprising how often that little &quot;s&quot; is tacked onto &quot;anyway&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anyways, just seen you&#039;re blog and don&#039;t want too miss a chance to says something that bugs me alot. But enough already. ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the dreaded &#8220;alot&#8221; was discussed earlier, I would like to voice another pet peeve of mine&#8230; &#8220;anyways&#8221;. It&#8217;s surprising how often that little &#8220;s&#8221; is tacked onto &#8220;anyway&#8221;.</p>
<p>Anyways, just seen you&#8217;re blog and don&#8217;t want too miss a chance to says something that bugs me alot. But enough already. <img src='http://thisfish.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna Batdorff</title>
		<link>http://thisfish.com/grammar-gaffe-friday/#comment-18623</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna Batdorff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisfish.com/?p=1252#comment-18623</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Is this just a &quot;Michigan thing&quot; or have others heard this: I seen it.  Educated, successful people say it. If I ask someone if they have seen a particular movie...the answer is likely to be, &quot;I seen it last weekend.&quot;  We also have our share of double negatives, me and I, bring and take, and other common errors...but the &quot;I seen it&quot; is heard every day.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this just a &#8220;Michigan thing&#8221; or have others heard this: I seen it.  Educated, successful people say it. If I ask someone if they have seen a particular movie&#8230;the answer is likely to be, &#8220;I seen it last weekend.&#8221;  We also have our share of double negatives, me and I, bring and take, and other common errors&#8230;but the &#8220;I seen it&#8221; is heard every day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LeAnn</title>
		<link>http://thisfish.com/grammar-gaffe-friday/#comment-18622</link>
		<dc:creator>LeAnn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 20:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisfish.com/?p=1252#comment-18622</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ok, I love all of you! I&#039;m an English prof who just ran across this site. We need more of you! lol  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;I, like, just can&#039;t, like, thank you all, like enough! (bet you can&#039;t, like, guess what my peeve, like, is?)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I love all of you! I&#8217;m an English prof who just ran across this site. We need more of you! lol  </p>
<p>I, like, just can&#8217;t, like, thank you all, like enough! (bet you can&#8217;t, like, guess what my peeve, like, is?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
