<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: tarts &amp; tricks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thisfish.com/tarts-tricks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thisfish.com/tarts-tricks/</link>
	<description>Found the bike. Not changing the title.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 05:54:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://thisfish.com/tarts-tricks/#comment-12739</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 04:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisfish.com/?p=1122#comment-12739</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think M does have a point here in that this blog does remind me (stylistically) of Stephanie Klein&#039;s Greek Tragedy. I can&#039;t explain it but it does have a somewhat disembodied quality.  And I can&#039;t compare it to the Old Fish as I am a new reader. But I still enjoy it and read it nonetheless.  And I do agree that as all writers know, you can&#039;t please everyone. Not everyone can be a fan. It is just the way it is so a few negative comments are healthy and should be expected.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think M does have a point here in that this blog does remind me (stylistically) of Stephanie Klein&#8217;s Greek Tragedy. I can&#8217;t explain it but it does have a somewhat disembodied quality.  And I can&#8217;t compare it to the Old Fish as I am a new reader. But I still enjoy it and read it nonetheless.  And I do agree that as all writers know, you can&#8217;t please everyone. Not everyone can be a fan. It is just the way it is so a few negative comments are healthy and should be expected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fish</title>
		<link>http://thisfish.com/tarts-tricks/#comment-12738</link>
		<dc:creator>Fish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 21:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisfish.com/?p=1122#comment-12738</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, I don&#039;t care if he&#039;s almost all grown up. He&#039;s still a kitten to me :)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I don&#8217;t care if he&#8217;s almost all grown up. He&#8217;s still a kitten to me <img src='http://thisfish.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RazDreams</title>
		<link>http://thisfish.com/tarts-tricks/#comment-12737</link>
		<dc:creator>RazDreams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 21:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisfish.com/?p=1122#comment-12737</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;well, on a completely &lt;i&gt;different&lt;/i&gt; note...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;fish, i love how you call sir hal your &quot;kitten,&quot; and i love it more than it&#039;s presumably the same reason that i also do the exact thing when discussing my own pet.  :)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, on a completely <i>different</i> note&#8230;</p>
<p>fish, i love how you call sir hal your &#8220;kitten,&#8221; and i love it more than it&#8217;s presumably the same reason that i also do the exact thing when discussing my own pet.  <img src='http://thisfish.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://thisfish.com/tarts-tricks/#comment-12736</link>
		<dc:creator>M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 21:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisfish.com/?p=1122#comment-12736</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Oh people, settle down. Believe me, in past instances I&#039;ve been one of the first to rush to Heather&#039;s defense when some idiot comes around trying to start something. Relax, I&#039;m not one of those idiots. I was merely commenting, as a long time reader and supporter (and enjoy...er?) of this site on something I&#039;ve noticed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;And no, I don&#039;t want this blog to stay exactly the same forever and ever, and no I don&#039;t agree that I&#039;m merely oblivious to a writer&#039;s style evolving or improving-- to address previous comments. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;This post, in particular, struck me because I can imagine the same story being told in... the old Fish way-- where I feel more like I&#039;m hearing a friend tell me a story over cocktails, a friend who&#039;s funny and smart and a really great story teller to boot. Nowadays things over here at This Fish end up sounding a little.... disembodied? Self concious? &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;If I wanted to read Greek Tragedy, I would. But I don&#039;t, because quite frankly I can&#039;t stand SK&#039;s writing, site, etc etc. (I find myself having more of a chuckle over Two Sisters, personally). &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;Look, maybe Fish doesn&#039;t care what lil old singular reader here thinks about the changes around here. Or maybe, like any writer worth her salt, she&#039;s open to constructive criticism, whether she agrees with it or not. What a writer doesn&#039;t need, however, is to be surrounded only by voices of glowing praise and choruses of &quot;You go girl!&quot; (figuratively speaking, fellow commenters). I&#039;m just chiming in because I have loved this site and this writer for quite some time and the change saddens me. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;But ultimately This Fish is what it is. And if I don&#039;t like what it&#039;s become and the change is intended to be permenant, then I simply don&#039;t have to read it. Just an admirer throwing their two cents in and (possibly) calling it a day.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;Best Wishes, Fish.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh people, settle down. Believe me, in past instances I&#8217;ve been one of the first to rush to Heather&#8217;s defense when some idiot comes around trying to start something. Relax, I&#8217;m not one of those idiots. I was merely commenting, as a long time reader and supporter (and enjoy&#8230;er?) of this site on something I&#8217;ve noticed.</p>
<p>And no, I don&#8217;t want this blog to stay exactly the same forever and ever, and no I don&#8217;t agree that I&#8217;m merely oblivious to a writer&#8217;s style evolving or improving&#8211; to address previous comments. </p>
<p>This post, in particular, struck me because I can imagine the same story being told in&#8230; the old Fish way&#8211; where I feel more like I&#8217;m hearing a friend tell me a story over cocktails, a friend who&#8217;s funny and smart and a really great story teller to boot. Nowadays things over here at This Fish end up sounding a little&#8230;. disembodied? Self concious? </p>
<p>If I wanted to read Greek Tragedy, I would. But I don&#8217;t, because quite frankly I can&#8217;t stand SK&#8217;s writing, site, etc etc. (I find myself having more of a chuckle over Two Sisters, personally). </p>
<p>Look, maybe Fish doesn&#8217;t care what lil old singular reader here thinks about the changes around here. Or maybe, like any writer worth her salt, she&#8217;s open to constructive criticism, whether she agrees with it or not. What a writer doesn&#8217;t need, however, is to be surrounded only by voices of glowing praise and choruses of &#8220;You go girl!&#8221; (figuratively speaking, fellow commenters). I&#8217;m just chiming in because I have loved this site and this writer for quite some time and the change saddens me. </p>
<p>But ultimately This Fish is what it is. And if I don&#8217;t like what it&#8217;s become and the change is intended to be permenant, then I simply don&#8217;t have to read it. Just an admirer throwing their two cents in and (possibly) calling it a day.</p>
<p>Best Wishes, Fish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fish</title>
		<link>http://thisfish.com/tarts-tricks/#comment-12735</link>
		<dc:creator>Fish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 10:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisfish.com/?p=1122#comment-12735</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, we were.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, we were.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
